Search

Cookies

We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you accept our use of cookies.

Business

NITI Aayog VC Lahiri Questions India's 'Difficult to Understand' Love for Gold

· · 3 min read

NITI Aayog Vice Chairperson Dr. Ashok Lahiri stated India's cultural affinity for gold is 'difficult to understand,' advocating for national savings over gold imports. He linked gold consumption to foreign exchange drain and discussed its impact on economic growth versus investment.

Dr. Ashok Lahiri, Vice Chairperson of NITI Aayog, has expressed his bewilderment regarding India's deep-rooted cultural affinity for gold, especially in light of its economic implications. In an exclusive interview, Dr. Lahiri addressed the recent hike in gold import duties and urged a national shift towards greater savings.

Understanding India's Gold Imports

During his discussion, Dr. Lahiri acknowledged the significant cultural ties Indians have with the precious metal but questioned its economic rationale. "Our love for gold, the Indian love for gold, is absolutely difficult to understand," he remarked. He emphasized that money spent on gold imports could otherwise be saved in banks, where it could be reinvested to fuel economic growth.

The NITI Aayog Vice Chairperson highlighted the government's move to increase gold import duties as a measure to curb what he termed "unnecessary spending." This initiative aligns with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's appeal for national austerity, aimed at conserving foreign exchange reserves.

National Austerity and Economic Growth

Dr. Lahiri defended the call for national austerity, clarifying that it is synonymous with national savings. He argued that avoiding non-essential expenditures, such as excessive gold imports, is always beneficial for the economy. "We import more when we spend more than what we earn. That is just natural arithmetic," he explained.

He further elaborated on the relationship between consumption, investment, and economic growth. Lahiri pointed out that total demand in an economy is a sum of consumption and investment. He suggested that if investment is robust, a temporary dip in consumption would not necessarily harm economic growth. Instead, financing investments through domestic savings, a model seen in many East Asian economies, is crucial for sustainable development.

The Balance Between Consumption and Investment

When questioned about the potential negative impact of reduced consumption on economic growth, Dr. Lahiri outlined an economic perspective:

  • Demand Dynamics: Consumption is one component of demand; investment is the other. Both contribute to total economic activity.
  • Savings as Fuel: Investments require funding, primarily sourced from domestic savings channeled through banking systems.
  • Investment-Driven Growth: Under-consumption becomes problematic only if investment is stagnant. If investment accelerates, it acts as a primary driver for economic expansion.

Contrasting the high-consumption model of the US, which often relies on foreign savings, with the "Asian model" of financing investment through domestic savings, Dr. Lahiri concluded, "So, are we suffering from an under-consumption problem? I doubt it." His statements underscore a strategic push towards enhancing national savings and channeling them into productive investments rather than non-productive assets like gold.

Related