Search

Cookies

We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you accept our use of cookies.

World

Viral Claim: US Dredged New Omani Shipping Corridor to Bypass Strait of Hormuz

· · 4 min read

A viral report claims the US covertly dredged a new shipping corridor in Omani waters, potentially offering an alternative to the Strait of Hormuz. This significant but unverified assertion could reshape global energy routes amid regional tensions.

A recent viral report has ignited speculation about a potential new shipping corridor on the Omani side of the Strait of Hormuz, purportedly dredged by the United States. The claim, emerging from a US-based news and political commentary program called Morse Report, suggests satellite imagery indicates a covert operation has created a previously unused route.

Unverified Claim Sparks Discussion

According to the Morse Report, this alleged new passage is approximately 1,600 feet wide with a natural depth of about 93 feet, theoretically allowing Very Large Crude Carriers (VLCCs) to navigate it after limited dredging. The report further suggests the route's geography, utilizing Jazirat Musandam and the curvature of the Earth, could shield vessels from direct Iranian observation. However, it is crucial to note that these claims remain unverified; there has been no official confirmation from the White House, the US military, or Omani authorities.

The Strategic Importance of the Strait of Hormuz

The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow waterway just 29 nautical miles wide at its most constricted point, is one of the world's most critical maritime chokepoints. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimated that around 20 million barrels of oil and petroleum products, representing roughly a quarter of global seaborne oil trade, passed through the strait daily in 2025. Its vulnerability extends beyond crude, as nearly 20% of global Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) exports from Qatar and the UAE also rely on this passage.

Recent regional tensions have underscored the strait's unreliability, forcing shipping companies to re-evaluate risks. This has accelerated the use of existing alternative infrastructure, such as Saudi Arabia's East-West pipeline to Yanbu on the Red Sea and the UAE's pipeline from Habshan to Fujairah, both of which bypass Hormuz. However, these bypasses can only redirect a fraction of the volumes typically transiting the strait.

What an Omani Corridor Could (and Couldn't) Change

Should the Morse Report's claim be substantiated, an Omani corridor could offer an additional navigational option, a valuable asset in times of disruption. Nevertheless, it would not constitute a complete bypass of the Strait of Hormuz, as the passage would still be geographically within the broader Hormuz region. Its practicality would hinge on numerous factors, including its precise location, depth, navigational restrictions, proximity to Iranian military assets, potential mine risks, insurance requirements, and the willingness of commercial shipping companies to utilize it.

Moreover, the assertion that the geography would render vessels completely invisible to Iran should be approached with caution. Being outside a direct line of sight does not preclude detection by radar, aircraft, drones, satellites, electronic surveillance, or other advanced military assets.

The Red Sea: A Second Critical Chokepoint

Adding another layer of complexity, the Red Sea and Bab el-Mandeb corridor, connecting the Indian Ocean to the Suez Canal, represent the shortest maritime route between Asia and Europe. This route is vital for a significant portion of global trade, especially container traffic. The ongoing conflict in Yemen, with Houthi threats against shipping, has introduced substantial risks, raising concerns that Bab el-Mandeb could become another major chokepoint.

This situation is particularly problematic as Saudi Arabia increasingly relies on its Red Sea infrastructure, like Yanbu, as an alternative outlet for crude. If both Hormuz and the Red Sea routes become compromised, ships carrying Gulf crude to Asia would face severe disruption, and vessels traveling between Asia and Europe would be forced to undertake the much longer journey around Africa's Cape of Good Hope. Such disruptions would lead to increased fuel consumption, longer voyage times, higher demand for vessels, and elevated insurance premiums, ultimately impacting global prices for goods and commodities.

Asian economies, particularly China and India, which together accounted for 44% of crude exports via Hormuz in 2025, are most exposed to these risks. For India, a prolonged disruption could significantly affect crude import costs, freight rates, refinery economics, and domestic fuel prices, compounded by its reliance on the Suez route for trade with Europe.

Related