Social activist Sonam Wangchuk has vehemently dismissed allegations that he struck a deal with the government to end his 26-day hunger strike. In a video message released Friday, Wangchuk questioned his critics' sincerity, asserting that his decision came only after receiving written assurances from the Centre on crucial demands.
Addressing the criticism that arose after Union ministers J.P. Nadda and Jitendra Singh were present when he broke his fast, Wangchuk expressed deep hurt. He challenged the notion of a 'bargain', stating, "If a bargain had to be made, would someone stay hungry for 26 days? Could I not have sat in an air-conditioned room and made a deal instead of fasting on the roadside in Delhi's heat?"
Reasons for Ending the Fast
Wangchuk clarified that his primary concern was the safety of students and other peaceful protesters involved in the movement. He revealed that he insisted on a written commitment from the government that no criminal cases would be filed against participants.
He explained his urgency, citing an apprehension of a major crackdown. "Last night, around midnight, I was told the ministers had agreed to give the assurance in writing. I was in a hurry because there was apprehension that a major crackdown could happen. I remembered what happened in Ladakh in September 2025 and feared something similar here. I felt that if I ended my fast and appealed for peace, the situation could be diffused," he stated.
Allegations of Mistreatment
Wangchuk also alleged that after being moved from the protest site to Safdarjung Hospital, he was treated "like a prisoner." He claimed he was denied free movement, prevented from meeting visitors, and barred from accessing his mobile phone or laptop. He had wished to end his fast surrounded by supporters and Members of Parliament, but circumstances reportedly did not allow it.
Political Reactions and Assurances
His clarification followed allegations by Congress MP Imran Masood, who suggested Wangchuk had reached a "personal deal" with the government, drawing comparisons to veteran activist Anna Hazare. These remarks ignited a political row, with BJP leaders defending Wangchuk and accusing the Congress of attempting to discredit the student-led movement.
Wangchuk concluded his hunger strike late Thursday after securing several written assurances from the Centre. These included:
- No legal action would be taken against peaceful protesters.
- Parliament would discuss examination reforms.
- The government would positively consider compensation for families of students who allegedly died by suicide following the NEET paper leak controversy.
Despite ending his fast, Wangchuk affirmed that the broader movement for accountability and education reforms would persist. He declared that the conclusion of his hunger strike was "not the end, but the beginning of accountability."