The Delhi Gymkhana Club, an esteemed institution steeped in over a century of history, is now embroiled in a legal battle for its very existence. The Land and Development Office (L&DO) has issued an eviction notice, demanding the club vacate its sprawling 27.3-acre premises on 2, Safdarjung Road in Lutyens Delhi by June 5.
Established on July 3, 1913, as the Imperial Delhi Gymkhana Club, it initially served as an exclusive social hub for British civil servants and military officials during the colonial era. After India gained independence in 1947, the "Imperial" prefix was dropped, and the club continued to be a symbol of the nation's elite. Most of its existing structures were constructed in the 1930s, preserving a distinct architectural heritage.
Government Cites Public Purpose and Security
The L&DO's directive, issued on May 22, invokes Clause 4 of the original lease deed, which grants the government the right to reclaim possession of the land if it is required for a "public purpose." The government asserts that the prime land, strategically located near the Prime Minister's residence in the heart of Lutyens Delhi, is essential for "strengthening and securing defence infrastructure, governance-related facilities, and other vital public security purposes."
"Upon such re-entry, the entire plot of land measuring 27.3 acres, along with all buildings, standing erections, structures, lawns, and fittings thereon, shall vest absolutely in the Lessor, i.e., the President of India, through the Land & Development Office," the notice reportedly stated.
Club Challenges Eviction, Seeks Clarity
In response to the eviction notice, the Delhi Gymkhana Club has filed a plea with the Delhi High Court, challenging the government's directive. Member Vijay Khurana filed the petition on behalf of the club. The club's General Committee convened an emergency meeting to review the situation and resolved to seek urgent clarification from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs and the L&DO.
The committee has raised several critical questions, including whether the government would consider allocating an alternative, appropriately located plot for the club. They also highlighted the significant investments made by the club in improving and enhancing its infrastructure and facilities over the years, noting that any relocation would entail substantial rebuilding costs.
Furthermore, the club has urged the government to consider the future of its numerous permanent and other employees and staff, whose livelihoods would be directly impacted by an eviction. The General Committee is actively seeking an urgent meeting with senior officials to discuss these pressing concerns and explore potential resolutions.